Cross-Post: Where is the Black Julia Roberts? By Aymar Jean Christian

by Melissa Silverstein on November 12, 2010

in Uncategorized

The “black actress” stepped into the spotlight last year, as Nia Long called out Beyoncé Knowles and other singers for taking roles; Tyler Perry released yet another film starring newcomer Taraji P. Henson; and Precious gave its stars, especially Mo’Nique, a chance to shine.

The November 5 release of Perry’s For Colored Girls puts the issue of black women in cinema back into the national conversation — even if it fails to redeem Tyler Perry. So I decided to posit an answer to the question: where are all the black leading ladies? Below: 1) why this question?, 2) a list, 3) the state of the black leading lady, and 4) how I came up with the current crop.

I. Where is the Black Julia Roberts? One Route to an Answer

Easier asked than answered! The question is really more provocation than anything. At a certain point, comparison between races is irrelevant: is Will Smith the “white” anyone? He’s Will Smith! The question, however, does open up an interesting discussion. Julia Roberts, like Meryl Streep, can do a lot: from Duplicity and Eat Pray Love to, now, August: Osage County. Roberts can choose her roles and she almost always plays the lead. What black actress could do the same, now or in the near future? The real issue leads us to ask: of the potential black leading ladies today, who is on top, who isn’t panning out, and why?

The list is ranked by the percentage of an actor’s total roles where she gets to play a leading lady. The point is to gauge the industry’s confidence in an actress’ bankability. I also added the box office grosses based on the actor’s “leading lady” films (IMDB Pro, Box Office Mojo); but this list isn’t organized by B.O. Other lists add up an actor’s total grosses over all her films, but this is misleading: you can have an incidental role for a film that made lots of money. So I added up all of an actor’s roles from 2000-2010, from low-budget to big-budget films. A “lead” role was defined as a major character integral to or featured in the marketing of the film; the character has a back-story or is key to the plot. More on method at the bottom.

There’s always folly in trying to quantify and list something. But I like lists not because they tell “the truth” — I wouldn’t put too much stock in the particular order below. Lists prompt discussion and reflection. What do these actors say about America? About Hollywood? About black women? So: let’s get to it!

***

II. Our Black Leading Ladies?

Beyoncé Knowles

Percentage of films led: 83. Box Office Pull: $215 million invested; $565 million grossed

Beyoncé Knowles tops this list mainly because of selectivity. The mega pop star doesn’t need to work in film, she chooses to. It seems Nia Long had a point about musicians taking film roles. Almost all her roles, except for the Pink Panther, I would characterize as leading, mainly because she often out-stars her co-stars. Would Cadillac Records have made even its measly $8 million without her? Jennifer Hudson was the breakout star of Dreamgirls, and the source musical might’ve sold tickets to the over-40 set, but Knowles put young people in seats. After the success of Obsessed, Knowles solidified her place as a movie star, and, hey, her acting is getting better — if reviews of Cadillac Records are to be believed.

***

Sanaa Lathan

Percentage of films led: 75. $88 million invested; $275 million grossed.

Sanaa Lathan made it up here for choosing prominent roles in small films. She’s headlined a number of prominent black films — Love & Basketball, Something New, Brown Sugar and The Family that Preys — and took a role like Wonderful World opposite Matthew Broderick, which nobody saw. Alien vs. Predator provides the bulk of her total grosses at $170 million. Lathan still has potential to be a big star, but she’ll need a good role in a well-written film. I’m concerned her villain role in Family that Preys might’ve marked her as the “bitch” to black audiences. She’ll need something solid to raise her profile again.

***

Halle Berry

Percentage of films led: 73. $388 million invested; $928 million grossed

Halle Berry could’ve had a perfect score, but I decided not to give her X-Men I, II and II, which is controversial I know. I did, however, give her Die Another Day; despite being a “Bond” movie, she was one of the more prominent Bond girls and was displayed in the film’s marketing (everyone remembers the bikini!). Catwoman was the industry’s $100 million vote of confidence in Berry’s star power, one that didn’t pan out. Berry has yet to fully recover from the bomb, but she has a host of projects planned for this and next year, including the much-anticipated film adaptation of Cloud Atlas and a bevy of films of different genres including thrillers, actioners, and comedies. Berry had come dangerously close the Megan Fox and Jennifer Aniston traps: known more for getting photographed and doing promotional campaigns than for doing films. But as she ages, she’s going to need to prove her chops once again if she wants to “Meryl Streep” into the latter part of her career. UPDATE: And it appears as though she’s already started! Berry is promoting her performance as a woman afflicted with multiple-personality disorder (including a racist one!) in Frankie and Alice to the Academy! With the film apparently receiving warm critical attention, could this be Berry’s return to Oscar gold and leading lady stardom?

***

Mariah Carey

Percentage of films led: 60. $33 million invested, $5 million grossed.

I only included Mariah Carey because her role in Precious, which was either quite good or just passable depending on whom you asked. She wasn’t a lead, really, but she did act well enough to start some chatter about her future in film — remember she was originally supposed to be in For Colored Girls. Carey’s Glitter really gives her all of her grosses, which says something. Her other lead roles are in films no one has ever heard of: WiseGirls and Tennessee anyone? She might be too old to beat out Beyoncé, but if she ever wanted to stop singing, she could make a go for it acting, given the right roles and a good story.

***

Queen Latifah

Percentage of films led: 53. $218 million invested; $678 million grossed

I was surprised Queen Latifah wasn’t at the top of the list, but it’s only because she works, often and consistently. I counted nine lead roles, from movies like Last Holiday and Just Wright that are clearly selling her and her alone, to ensembles like Mad Money and co-starring roles like Bringing Down the House. Other than that, Latifah plays a lot of maternal, best friend type roles — like an artist/activist in Hairspray and a prison officer in her Oscar-nominated turn in Chicago. They’re good roles, and she does them well, but I wouldn’t call them leading roles. Other than that, she occasionally plays the perfect professional, in films like What Happens in Vegas (therapist) and Stranger than Fiction (writer’s assistant). Unfortunately for Latifah, Just Wright did not do well in theaters, and was her biggest attempt yet to “Julia Roberts” herself into an adorable, romantic lead, instead of just the woman you like to have fun with (the ultimate BBF). Still, perhaps more than any black actress out there, Latifah sells her movies; she plays an integral role in the marketing of almost any film she’s in, meaning she really earned that nearly $700 million total.

***

Jennifer Hudson

Percentage of films led: 50. $81 million invested; $194 million grossed.

I’m really bullish on Jennifer Hudson. So far, I think she’s still resting on her Dreamgirls laurels, but who wouldn’t? It’s by definition a career-making role. Other than The Secret Life of Bees, she’s been fairly quiet, for obvious personal and professional reasons. Nonetheless, she’s signed on to play Winnie Mandela, wife of Nelson Mandela, in a forthcoming biopic Winnie, which sounds like the perfect substantial, buzzworthy role for her. She’s also lost weight, which unfortunately does matter in Hollywood (in my opinion she was lovely before), and she’s getting photographed so people still care about her. Her acting appears to be improving, and if she can channel it into a blowout performance in Winnie, she could be a Diana/Whitney/Beyoncé-style dynamo: singing and acting all the way to the bank.

***

Thandie Newton

Percentage of films led: 38. $131 million invested; $671 million grossed.

Is it just me, or is Thandie Newton really still famous for Mission Impossible? I don’t know. Anyway, I gave it to her, since it put her name on the map and was a big part of the film — that’s a judgment call I’m willing to take back. Anyway, her other lead roles are small. In bigger films, she tends to also play the love interest or just a nice girl: Norbit, Riddick, Pursuit of Happyness (ok, sort of), 2012 (sort of). She was pretty good, surprisingly so, as Condoleeza Rice in W, so she can act. For Colored Girls puts her back in the mix after Crash, and she has a couple more movies coming out.

***

Gabrielle Union

Percentage of films led: 35. $43 million invested; $66 million

Gabrielle Union is nothing if not productive! Union has averaged two films a year over the past ten years, almost all of them targeted squarely at the black community. She has done a few art-house films — like Neo Ned with Jeremy Renner — but nobody saw them. Despite counting over 20 films, I couldn’t find many big grossers in the bunch. Union’s limited film market has effectively taken her off the list when it comes to big Hollywood roles currently nabbed by Halle Berry, Kerry Washington and the other “pretty” women. While Union has held prominent place in a number of marketing campaigns, she might not be able to shift her persona beyond the average, sometimes likable/sometimes bitchy black girl, always a love interest (girlfriend, mother, “fun buddy”). It’s done her quite well on television, but the film industry isn’t giving her much to work with.

***

Kerry Washington

Percentage of films led: 33. $36 million invested; $49.2 million grossed

Kerry Washington is probably, in my mind, the natural heir to Halle Berry: beautiful, sophisticated, with some acting chops. Her big roles have too been in small films, and she has yet to get “that role” that defines who she is and what she can do. Last King of Scotland and Ray let people know she was a serious actress, not just a pretty face. And she offers nice support in big films like Fantastic Four and Mr. and Mrs. Smith: she doesn’t hurt but doesn’t sell tickets either. While she hasn’t been given a chance to shine, there’s no evidence she lacks the potential, and perhaps For Colored Girls will give her the appropriate launching pad. Meanwhile, I saw her on Broadway in Race, and while she didn’t blow me away, she met expectations, which is hard in live theater.

***

Sophie Okonedo

Percentage of films led: 30. $28.5 million invested; $73 million grossed

With a rare Oscar nomination under her belt, Sophie Okonedo has the privilege of artistic credibility. What she doesn’t have is any track record of marketability. Nonetheless, she’s clearly talented and able to do bigger projects. Her starring role in the recent film Skin was a wise move, giving her a major role with a lot emotional work. Critics loved it, but nobody saw it. Still, she’s versatile: able to play mother, girlfriend, warm and even action star  (though Æon Flux was a critical and commercial flop). The jury’s still out on Okonedo: she definitely belongs in films, but time will tell if she’ll stay an indie darling or if she’ll branch out big into Hollywood — if she chooses to.

***

Zoe Saldana

Percentage of films led: 27. $84 million invested; $136 million grossed.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of Zoe Saldana’s career so far is how often she’s cast among men — lots of men. As a lead, she’s held her own in actioners like Takers and The Losers and comedies like Death at a Funeral and Guess Who. Unfortunately, in her biggest films, she’s been playing smaller, “love interest” roles: Uhuru in the latest Star Trek and a blue person in Avatar. Saldana ranks lower because she, like Queen Latifah, works quite frequently, with over 20 films in the last decade. Like a Taraji P. Henson, she’s newly on the rise. Unlike a Sanaa Lathan, though, she tends not to get cast to lead black films, instead playing a broad range of secondary characters in independent films, from the “best friend,” “girlfriend,” or tough professional. Nonetheless, Saldana has some serious buzz around her, marking as one of the few women in Hollywood who can play it tough like Angelia Jolie (the others: Natalie Portman, Kate Beckinsale, Mila Jovovich; with potentially others like Rooney Mara coming up). Acting in sci-fi films was a smart move, as the fanboys tend to be loyal: ask Angelina “Tomb Raider” Jolie or Sigourney “Alien” Weaver. She looks nice in those Calvin Klein commercials, but can she keep her male fan base while bringing in the women she’ll need to carry her through bigger roles?

***

Nia Long

Percentage of films led: 27. $55 million invested; $190 million grossed.

I got some scoffs for including Nia Long on this list. Part of my criteria was to look at who has led films in the last ten years, and Long’s heyday was clearly in the 1990s. Nevertheless, she still works, and was recently on the cover of Ebony looking rather fabulous, I’d say — she’s kept her fans in the community. Can Long come back in a big way? Never say never. My guess is she needs a strong role to prove her acting chops as a mature actress, coupled with a rom-com, which is where people seem to want to see her. She’s got one of each coming up.

***

Mo’Nique

Percentage of films led: 25. $13 million invested; $70 million grossed.

If there’s one thing it seems Mo’Nique does not care about it’s Hollywood, famously refusing to shill for the Oscar she recently won. She seems happy to host her BET show in Atlanta, which, along with Tyler Perry’s 34th Street, seems to be the place for black people in film looking to shun the industry. Who can blame her? She’s been doing this a long time, with little hope of being Halle Berry. Now she gets to talk to all her friends, support entertainers who don’t get support, and keep it positive (have you seen her show? It’s all about community support). But her performance in Precious was a revelation, one of the best of decade in my opinion, so I hope a good script comes her way and gives her another chance to shine. Right now, her career’s been limited to mostly black comedies where she plays comic relief.

***

Taraji P. Henson

Percentage of films led: 18. $18 million invested; $61 million grossed.

Taraji P. Henson is a rising star, and I was surprised she wasn’t higher on the list. But her low position is mainly because her star has only recently risen. Before I Can Do Bad All By Myself and Not Easily Broken — and yes, her turn as mammy in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button — she spent most of her time playing side roles, as the “best black wife ever” in The Family that Preys, more “down” girls in Hustle and Flow and Talk to Me, and a tough lesbian Smokin’ Aces. While she’s proven very marketable to black audiences, mainstream cinema still isn’t giving her much to do: her turn as a police officer in Date Night seemed to epitomize that. Yet, post-Oscar, she’s getting cast in serious films (Once Fallen) with serious actors (Tom Hanks, Larry Crowne) and has another starring role in a film (From the Rough). Her future for now is bright.

***

Viola Davis

Percentage of films led: 10. $47 million invested; $30 million grossed

I was surprised Viola Davis was so low on this list! Another Oscar nominee, Davis has serious buzz around her too, but as yet she hasn’t really been given much to do, save The Architect, which critics merely liked. Instead, Davis seems to play an awful lot of professional, serious women, characters without much of a back-story but who are good at their jobs: see Madea Goes to Jail (social worker), Knight and Day (Intelligence official), Syriana (CIA boss), etc. They’re respectable roles, just not very memorable. She’s got BBF locked down — see Nights in Rodanthe and Eat Pray Love — also maids and mothers — Doubt, Far From Heaven and Get Rich or Die Tryin’. But Davis can act. She needs a movie!

***

III. The State of the Black Leading Lady

It’s hard to be a woman in Hollywood. It’s hard to be black in Hollywood. So, obviously, it stands to reason it’s hard to be a black woman. It can be boring to hear — “black women have it tough, huh, what else is new?” — but it’s true!

One good place to start is New York‘s new “Star Market,” which is a great resource for people wanting to know more about how stars are made and unmade by the throngs of publicists, casting directors, producers and studio execs in Hollywood. One theme from the feature rings clear: it’s much tougher for women. The 2000s haven’t been bad to black actors and actresses: stars like Will Smith and Queen Latifah rose in power; 22 actors and actresses were nominated for and 7 won Academy Awards — in the previous 70 years, only 36 had been nominated and 6 had won. But the overall picture for black women is less rosy than for their male counterparts: most black-led independent and mainstream films are centered on men.

It’s hard to assign blame. Surely, the industry’s partially at fault: too few black/women directors, screenwriters, people above/below the line. But the industry also responds to what America wants, and year after year, movies led by white/men top the box office. Every once in awhile, something shakes the conventional wisdom — Sex and the City, or films by Sandra Bullock , Tyler Perry and Will Smith — but the conventional wisdom more or less remains because Hollywood is congenitally cautious. Once again, who’s to blame? Most films fail, and job security is hard to come by, so how much can we blame industry workers for not taking risks? I don’t know. Let’s talk about it.

Nevertheless, a small group of black women have been given a chance and few have proven themselves marketable; many of them — six on this list — have Oscar wins and nominations. None of them can touch $4 billion Will Smith, but a number can pull in audiences. We’ve come a very long way, but we have a long way to go!

***

IV. How I Went About It

How do you measure star power? There are many ways to do it. For the black actress, so often overlooked, the issue of measuring value is particularly acute. I wanted to come up with a way that honored the diversity of roles these actors played that still highlighted the imbalances in the industry. Hence the focus on “leading” roles, and the downplaying of other factors — like salary, box office gross and average production and marketing budget (which are the real industry standards).

Most black actresses do not get to play leading roles, even fewer get leading roles in blockbuster films. For this reason, I thought it was important to count equally roles in independent, art-house and blockbuster films — so a leading role in a Tyler Perry film counts as much as a leading role in a Michael Mann film. Even still, most of the women on the list, nine out of fifteen, spent most of their time not in a leading role. Even some of those with scores over 50% have to be qualified: Beyoncé Knowles, Jennifer Hudson and Mariah Carey do not work that often, nor is acting their primary profession.

I started counting what films each actor had been in, relying on IMDB Pro. I also tracked the budget and gross of each film using BoxOfficeMojo and IMDB Pro — and of course information on either wasn’t always available.

I categorized the actor’s role in each film based on five “types:” Leading Lady, Best Friend, Mother/Family, Love Interest and Professional.

Leading Lady – Integral to or featured in the marketing of the film. The character has a back-story or is integral to the plot.
Best Friend – A character who is a friend, confidant, or villain who is there only to serve emotional fulfillment on main character.
Mother/Family – Mother or family. Includes “mammy” and “strong ghetto mother” types: a maternal figure or a guide of some sort, there to emotional/psychologically fulfill leads.
Love Interest – A character who is there as love interest to fulfill romantic, sexual needs primarily of the lead or other major character.
Professional - A character who is valuable primarily for their expertise or profession, intended to further the plot and journey of the protagonist.

Basically a “leading lady” could be any one of those types, or a character without any specific type, but the crucial aspect was the actor’s role in the film’s marketing, prominence in an ensemble cast, or being the integral attraction in the film.  This is not to diminish the importance of supporting roles, which are some of the best parts, but if we’re invested in creating stars, the fact is that stars lead. So I gave Mo’Nique a “leading lady” for Precious, because her performance basically sold the film, IMHO. Queen Latifah’s role in Valentine’s Day too counted as leading lady, because she was a big star in a big cast. But Halle Berry didn’t get an LL for X-Men (I’d say the franchise, plus Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart and Anna Paquin really sold the films). In the end, all this is subjective, so feel free to disagree and change my mind!

I should say that the original list was much, much longer. I started by generating a list of actors in film and television who have worked or been buzzed about for about throughout the 1990s and 2000s. That list got to about 40 actors. Too long! So then I decided to focus on film, where there’s more money and a higher profile, and to limit it to the 2000s, for the sake of my sanity. That led me to the 15 actors above. Missing from this list are whole bunch of actresses who either a) did most of their work in 1990s; b) mostly do television; c) are, sadly, too old to really deliver films anymore; d) don’t work consistently. Some of them, however, could still be huge, or are huge in their own right, but I’m only one person!

The actresses I did not look at for time and other constraints: Anika Noni Rose; Jill Scott; Jada Pinkett-Smith; Paula Patton; Alicia Keys; Janet Jackson; Angela Bassett; Vivica A Fox; Tia and Tamera Mowry; Kimberly Elise; Raven-Symoné; Lisa Bonet; Regina King; Janet Jackson; Robin Givens; Whitney Houston; Aisha Tyler; Lynn Whitfield; Ruby Dee; Vanessa Williams; Alfre Woodard; Phylicia Rashad; Sherri Shepherd; Audra McDonald; Loretta Devine; Gabourey Sidibe.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Aymar Jean Christian researches visual culture — including web series, television, and film — at the Annenberg School at the University of Pennsylvania. He has been published in publications like Newsweek, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and scholarly journals like First Monday and Communication, Culture and Critique. For more information, visit my website.

Share

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Scott Mendelson November 12, 2010 at 10:44 AM

Zaldana was a co-lead in Avatar, and a her fiercely emotional work is big reason why the film wasn’t just a special effects exercise. Credit where credit is due, she was much more than just a token love interest.

Kathryn November 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM

I love to see Zoe Saldana, Gabrielle Union, and Queen Latifah in a cast. I think they all have TREMENDOUS talent and are just gorgeous. Queen Latifah has proved herself time and time again, Gabrielle Union’s eyebrows could have a career all their own (no, really, her facial expressions convey more emotions than some actors!), and I have loved watching Zoe Saldana since the first I saw Center Stage. All amazing actresses that I wish I could see more of!

chris November 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM

^
Scott

Saldana , like Linda Hamilton after T2, to me isn’t getting the career boost despite the slate of ‘her performance transcends the film’ reviews because the special effects are taking precedence in the minds of Hollywood execs who have a case of copycat fever.

AJ November 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM

@Scott I’m starting to realize that my categorization of Saldana’s role is a minority opinion!

I think the problem with ‘Avatar’ is that marketing stressed the “event”-ness of the picture, and James Cameron’s direction — not the acting. None of the posters for the film even have the actor’s names. This is, of course, Cameron’s modus operandi. Even ‘Titanic’, which made Kate Winslet a star (and she’s much more the star of that film than Saldana is in Avatar), wasn’t really about her, either. I still think the ‘star’ of Avatar was the technology and James Cameron himself; the poor writing and simplistic depiction of the Na’vi only underscore why critics have not given Saldana credit.

d November 15, 2010 at 3:06 PM

I have a lot to say about the list, so I’ll probably break this up into 2 posts.

First of all thanks AJ for taking the time to create this list, and thanks Melissa for posting it!!
 
I think this is particularly relevant for us at W&H, because to me this is the huge chink in the armor when we talk about black actresses. I think AJ hits it on the head the best when talking about Zoe: “can she keep her male fan base while bringing in the women she’ll need to carry her through bigger roles?” Really what I am wondering these days is will the majority of non-black, or non-minority women support black actresses regardless of whether they have an action base or no.

I have been following this for a while, but it really crystallized for me watching It’s Complicated right after reading this. If you want to talk about a white landscape, you don’t get much whiter than that. Yes, she writes about upperclass women, and that tends to impact how homogenous the family looks. But I saw multiple scenes in which they could have added more black women: one of Meryl’s friends, a noticeable amount during the graduation scene (since we know college graduation rates are high for black women), both parties that bookend the movie, Steve Martin’s partner, Meryl Streep’s therapist, the attending doctor, I could go on. I use those roles specifically because it doesn’t mess with the star power of the main leads. And I think that is more telling; if you cannot even diversify the varying degrees of supporting roles, then I find it less believeable that you can diversify the “leading” roles. Mind you, despite the homogeneity, the film did manage to show some black male wait staff and Meryl’s latino worker(s).

When I look at the trailers for The Kids Are Alright and Winter’s Bone (two films directing and starring women) again you see a landscape that is pretty homogenous. It’s almost unbelievable to expect to see people of color in general in Winter’s Bone. And while Yaya is in The Kids… she must not have played a very large role (or does she?). On the other hand, if we look at sci-fi and action/adventure, I can find a variety of ethnicity (including black women) up and down the food chain, from the minimal and stereotypical to the substantial and fully dimensional.

What makes Julia so interesting is that she has over time been able to put up big blockbuster numbers for films that are romantic comedies. And it seems that is where people thoroughly want her – Mary Reilly didn’t do so well, neither did Duplicity (it just made its production money back, and that was with foreign gross). So on the one hand Julia’s awesome (I enjoyed her since Mystic Pizza)! But she also has to live in a very narrow field to achieve box office success, unlike Will Smith or Tom Cruise who can do any genre under the sun.

So I guess I am wondering the following things. Will women support black women who are in romantic comedies when they are not the comic relief and/or bff, but the outright heroine? Are there any movies we can point to where women have?

The other question I am wondering about is why such a stark absence in the indie field? Not quite Julia Roberts, but do we have a Cate Blanchett, or Kate Winslet? Maybe you need to be named Kate? :p But you don’t have the pressure of big box office, or pleasing millions of viewers – you even get cred for going off the beaten path, and doing something interesting and different. But in terms of black women, the landscape seems to be the same.

So just to bring it full circle, how about a nice Nancy Meier film about an older upperclass black woman, played by someone who we know has acting chops, but may not be getting lead and/or film work (ie. Angela, Vanessa, Viola), who struggles but eventually finds love. Will we roll our eyes at yet another romantic comedy – probably. :) But we could also celebrate the hopes of a changing landscape.

d November 15, 2010 at 3:15 PM

So I liked the list, and I more or less agree with the ranking. That was an interesting and creative way to sort of qualify the impact of black actresses w/o having to rely on box office. I guess for me I wonder if it skewes to far the other way.

Beyonce: At first I was going to say it’s dicey to use selectivity to determine prominence, because then that would make every non-acting celebrity ahead because they would have another career to rely on. Also, some of the reasons some others are not higher on the list (say Sophie) is because of selectivity. They choose the roles, and take the financial consequences for it. But I can also see how selectivity can show how an actor is secure enough to be able to pick the roles s/he likes. Maybe power is in being able to be selective, yet not lose your fan/financial base?

Halle: Mind you I did not like Halle (at all…) in the x-men series, but the film really was sold partly off her back. It had to be, there were no really big stars to do it with. She was the biggest, while sir Ian had the acting creds, and Patrick Stewart and Famke Jansen had love from other fan bases. But in the first film the top three billed was Ian, Patrick and Halle (not that order). This was especially true after Halle won her Oscar. The second and thrid films did feature Hugh much more, since he turned into box office gold, but Halle was still the dominent female celeb, even if it wildly contrasts when you look at the second film (she got a much meatier role in the third). So I think she should get leading lady cred for all of them, but especially the first and the third. Anna may get higher billing now since True Blood, but she didn’t factor much in marketing over the others. Unless this film was radically marketed differently elsewhere than it was in the NYC region.

Thandie: Is it really so surpising that she did a good job as Condoleeza? I actually thinks she has great acting chops (hey I could be biased! :)). But what about her role in Beloved? It was not only integral (she is the title character after all), but it was pretty ambitious. In fact, everything about Beloved was ambitious. Does she really have small lead roles? Or are they just in small films (Truth About Charlie, Run, Fatboy Run, RocknRolla)?

Zoe: Add me to the list but Zoe needs to be so much higher on this list! If one of the factors that determines a lead is the backstory and/or integral role in the film, the she nails it. If her role was any bigger she would be the lead. And this is particularly telling since this is done in an action film (as opposed to a drama). Also, I actually I thought she was both marketed and had positive reviews by critiques. While many seemed amazed by the effects (and rightfully so), the only performances I actually heard talked about were the women (Zoe, Michelle, Sigourney, and CC Pounder). For being the avatar, Sam didn’t get much traction. And while her name wasn’t on the poster, neither was Sam’s, so that seems to give them more equal footing (than say Thandie who was a lead, and whose name was not on the poster – just Tom’s (MI:2)). While I agree that it was Sam’s face on the initial poster, everytime I saw an article about the film, it was Zoe’s Navi face that I saw. I thought it was cool at the time, as she seemed to be the face of the Navi, and by default the face of the movie. And I’d even say she received a little power from that. I read a non-shooting script of the Losers, and the main female lead was not a latina. So could we speculate that they changed it to fit Zoe’s background?

In speaking of black latinas, if we’re including Zoe, why not include others? While Gina Torres may just make honorable mention in the paragraph below, I could easily see Rosario Dawson on this list as well.

Lastly, it would be really interesting to see what would happen if we turned our gaze on the small screen. That is where many female actors are really shining these days. I wonder if that also translates to female black actors as well?

Thanks again for the analysis!

pandora uk December 1, 2011 at 3:37 AM

You had some nice points here. I done a research on the topic and got most peoples will agree with you

Karl Real June 23, 2012 at 3:34 PM

Hi, Neat post. There’s an issue with your website in internet explorer, would check this¡K IE still is the marketplace leader and a huge element of people will leave out your magnificent writing because of this problem.

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: