<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celluloid Ceiling 2008 Statistics- It Still Sucks for Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/</link>
	<description>from a feminist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Girls on Film: Truth v. Fiction, The Female Directorial Pool &#124; Movie Listings Central</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6622</link>
		<dc:creator>Girls on Film: Truth v. Fiction, The Female Directorial Pool &#124; Movie Listings Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=2007#comment-6622</guid>
		<description>[...] the Oscars this year, but that&#8217;s just one part of a business where female directors accounted for only 9% of the top 250 films of 2008. So how should Hollywood expand as we move into the next decade? While we should continue to foster [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Oscars this year, but that&#8217;s just one part of a business where female directors accounted for only 9% of the top 250 films of 2008. So how should Hollywood expand as we move into the next decade? While we should continue to foster [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=2007#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the work you are doing on figures/statistics about women in the movie industry. Female representation in film, and as directors, is often worse than female representation in Parliament. I live in NZ where we have 34% female representation in Parliament (that beats the 26% odd of female film directors; although I can&#039;t remember the exact percentage). We are bean counters, and proud ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the work you are doing on figures/statistics about women in the movie industry. Female representation in film, and as directors, is often worse than female representation in Parliament. I live in NZ where we have 34% female representation in Parliament (that beats the 26% odd of female film directors; although I can&#8217;t remember the exact percentage). We are bean counters, and proud ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotos de chicas en tangas</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>fotos de chicas en tangas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=2007#comment-3748</guid>
		<description>I should notify u about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should notify u about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally Acker</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally Acker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=2007#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>The percentage of women directors before 1920 was actually about 45% greater than today.

See: www.reelwomen.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The percentage of women directors before 1920 was actually about 45% greater than today.</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://www.reelwomen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reelwomen.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll-O-Matic</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll-O-Matic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=2007#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Maybe if Women Directors stopped doing movies that were terrible and made no money this would change.

Just Sayin....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if Women Directors stopped doing movies that were terrible and made no money this would change.</p>
<p>Just Sayin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UGLY DEAF MUSLIM PUNK GURL!</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/03/13/celluloid-ceiling-2008-statistics-it-still-sucks-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>UGLY DEAF MUSLIM PUNK GURL!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=2007#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>depressing. Only 16%? I had no idea it was this low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depressing. Only 16%? I had no idea it was this low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
