<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexism Watch: Publishers Weekly Top Ten Books of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/</link>
	<description>from a feminist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-6551</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-6551</guid>
		<description>Hurray for tokenism! It must be miserable being angry all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurray for tokenism! It must be miserable being angry all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-6484</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-6484</guid>
		<description>Instead of generalities, please be specific in your criticism of the list. Please write a defense of one or two books written by women that certainly should be included in the top 10. Could it just be that these are the ten best books because they are in fact the best? Do they lack in merit somehow? Is it so obviously sexism is at play here? And if so, how do you know that? A little critical thinking, instead of lazy-minded judgments, would go a long way here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of generalities, please be specific in your criticism of the list. Please write a defense of one or two books written by women that certainly should be included in the top 10. Could it just be that these are the ten best books because they are in fact the best? Do they lack in merit somehow? Is it so obviously sexism is at play here? And if so, how do you know that? A little critical thinking, instead of lazy-minded judgments, would go a long way here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can you trust Wikipedia? &#124; csmonitor.com</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5861</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you trust Wikipedia? &#124; csmonitor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5861</guid>
		<description>[...] Weekly&#8217;s failure to include any female authors in their 10 Ten of 2009 list can still kick up a bit of a dust storm – that this statistic about Wikipedians is not more widely commented [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weekly&#8217;s failure to include any female authors in their 10 Ten of 2009 list can still kick up a bit of a dust storm – that this statistic about Wikipedians is not more widely commented [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5820</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5820</guid>
		<description>Did you see they gave the &quot;really&quot; treatment last night to the Goldman Sachs bonuses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see they gave the &#8220;really&#8221; treatment last night to the Goldman Sachs bonuses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5817</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5817</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how women became a pc issue.  so annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how women became a pc issue.  so annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5813</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5813</guid>
		<description>I resent that they seem to think having women on their list is merely &quot;political correctness&quot;-- that quality work from women would only be noticed as a sort of literary affirmative action instead of its merits.  I&#039;m embarrassed for the people making this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I resent that they seem to think having women on their list is merely &#8220;political correctness&#8221;&#8211; that quality work from women would only be noticed as a sort of literary affirmative action instead of its merits.  I&#8217;m embarrassed for the people making this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5804</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5804</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m developing a real animus for Caroline Picard on this site.

But to stay on topic...  I also like the next sentence after the one about &quot;no women, so sorry,&quot; and that was the acknowledgment that some genres were ignored.  You would think that they would have the grace to admit that it isn&#039;t the best 100 of the year, but the best 100 that they bothered to pay attention to or read.  And yes, that does mean that superior work by women and people working in despised genres will be ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m developing a real animus for Caroline Picard on this site.</p>
<p>But to stay on topic&#8230;  I also like the next sentence after the one about &#8220;no women, so sorry,&#8221; and that was the acknowledgment that some genres were ignored.  You would think that they would have the grace to admit that it isn&#8217;t the best 100 of the year, but the best 100 that they bothered to pay attention to or read.  And yes, that does mean that superior work by women and people working in despised genres will be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Sexism Watch: Publishers Weekly Top Ten Books of 2009 &#124; Women &#38; Hollywood -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5793</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Sexism Watch: Publishers Weekly Top Ten Books of 2009 &#124; Women &#38; Hollywood -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5793</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Elisabeth Fies and Melissa Wardy, Mary Hart. Mary Hart said: Sexism Watch: Publishers Weekly Top Ten Books of 2009 &#124; Women ... http://bit.ly/4DBatU www.OvarianMD.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Elisabeth Fies and Melissa Wardy, Mary Hart. Mary Hart said: Sexism Watch: Publishers Weekly Top Ten Books of 2009 | Women &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/4DBatU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4DBatU</a> <a href="http://www.OvarianMD.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.OvarianMD.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomai in L.A. (it rhymes)</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5784</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomai in L.A. (it rhymes)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5784</guid>
		<description>Were they all males?  

I&#039;ve learned not to listen to all male critique and not read all male contributor lists. 

They turn me off.  They are simply sexist and they either don&#039;t know t or don&#039;t care. Not just biased, sexist, because if the group is all male and not one of them said, &quot;hey, lets get someone from the 51% in here&quot; that is sexist and ....idiotic.

That list, isn&#039;t even worthy of my comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were they all males?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned not to listen to all male critique and not read all male contributor lists. </p>
<p>They turn me off.  They are simply sexist and they either don&#8217;t know t or don&#8217;t care. Not just biased, sexist, because if the group is all male and not one of them said, &#8220;hey, lets get someone from the 51% in here&#8221; that is sexist and &#8230;.idiotic.</p>
<p>That list, isn&#8217;t even worthy of my comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5775</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5775</guid>
		<description>This should get the Saturday Night Live &quot;Really?&quot; treatment.  Really, women are more than half the world and not one wrote a book on the best list? Really? In the best book short list, I can sorta buy that there are not all nationalities or religions or races or regions represented every year in the top 5 or 10. If you did that you&#039;d have to have slots. But women? Come on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should get the Saturday Night Live &#8220;Really?&#8221; treatment.  Really, women are more than half the world and not one wrote a book on the best list? Really? In the best book short list, I can sorta buy that there are not all nationalities or religions or races or regions represented every year in the top 5 or 10. If you did that you&#8217;d have to have slots. But women? Come on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>There was a good article on SocioImages (you can google it) about how many people, including males and females, white and colored, view white males as &quot;neutral&quot; while vieweing everyone else in a different light, which is just a huge f--king shame.

This, my friends, is a great example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a good article on SocioImages (you can google it) about how many people, including males and females, white and colored, view white males as &#8220;neutral&#8221; while vieweing everyone else in a different light, which is just a huge f&#8211;king shame.</p>
<p>This, my friends, is a great example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Picard</title>
		<link>http://womenandhollywood.com/2009/11/06/sexism-watch-publishers-weekly-top-ten-books-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-5762</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Picard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenandhollywood.com/?p=4064#comment-5762</guid>
		<description>This is where my little rant neends to be:

What Year Is This?


What I wanted to title this is &quot;Are You New Here&quot;? and yet I changed my mind because I am starting to realize that yeah, some people are new to this whole &quot;sexism&quot; thing.  I had a weekend off, so I spent time catching up on some TV time, not the news channels, actually looking for shows.  That was interesting, nothing, and I mean nothing was on, until I hit the biography channel. Two shows caught my eye, &quot;Hippies&quot; and &quot;Sex In 69&quot;, now that might hold my attention, since I lived it.  Hippies is great and I recommend to anyone that has teenagers that think they are changing the world, to sit them down and watch this.  But the show that really caught me was &quot;Sex In 69&quot;, I had no idea just how much the year 1969 changed the world.  You see I graduated from high school in ’69, so I was busy living it, never thinking that history was in the making.  This show was a huge reminder of what our generation &quot;the baby boomers&quot; were doing back then.  All the major revolutions in culture were happening, and watching it, instead of living it was eye opening.  It was the beginning of the sexual revolution, gay liberation, the civil rights, music, art, everything changed in this country in that year.  We not only went to the moon, we changed this planet.

I’ve always known that I came from a very special time. Just our music alone tells me that.  I think anyone that is my age deep down inside realizes that.  Even though today most would think that we a very open minded people, it’s quite evident to some of us, that isn’t quite true.  In a lot of ways we have gone backward, especially when it comes to all the &quot;isms&quot;.  Sexism, racism, genderism, chauvinism, all those lovely &quot;isms&quot; are back stronger than ever.  And does it confuse the hell out of me.

All the talk about what happen on Letterman and the sexism, only proves it.  It proves that somewhere along the way from 1969 to 2009, the ball got dropped.  Women have regressed 40 years, from sisterhood to &quot;hey, I got mine, you get yours&quot;.   Especially in the comedy industry.  Watching all these shows for women from The View to Joy Behar’s new show and their shock about this is truly laughable.  Like I said earlier &quot;Are you new here?&quot;.  More men writing for Leno and Letterman than women, really?  Please whatever sisterhood we had has totally gone out and has been replaced by, well it hasn’t been replaced, it’s just plain gone.  It doesn’t exist anymore, especially in the world of comedy, and especially in stand-up.  Take some time and count the female headliners in clubs this week.  If you get five, you’ll be counting in &quot;comedy math&quot;.  You cannot and will not find five female headliners.  Now, count the male headliners.

To quote one club owner &quot;I already have four women headliners, that’s enough&quot;.  Are you serious?  Four women, four weeks out of the year, the other 48, men, normally, three men, talking about the same thing men talk about----mostly us.

If men are uncomfortable with women, especially in comedy, it’s because we know your show and we know your mind, you are idiots, nasty, stinky, arrogant idiots.  And screw you, women are funny, and I have had enough of this bullshit.

And the fact that women that are in positions to help other women in comedy are sitting around in their happy hosting chairs even promoting this stupid line of questioning, makes them idiots too.  I’m sorry ladies, I know just how much &quot;sisterhood&quot; we have in this business, none, nada, neit, uhuh, there is none.  So stop, take a deep breathe and think about all this.  Start asking the questions that we care about.  Some of you were ready to hang Clarence Thomas, while some of us were saying &quot;this woman is an idiot&quot;, but then again I came from a different time period.  I was a secretary back then, yes we had these problems, but we also had the phone number of the wife and the mistress, game over. 

So to answer the question &quot;Why is this still happening?&quot; Answer:  Because you let it, that’s why, and the ones of us that trying to stop it, well I think you know what we are called.  Sisterhood is a memory, a good memory, but a memory still.  It’s a shame that the young women of today never got to understand what that truly meant.

Thank you,

Caroline Picard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where my little rant neends to be:</p>
<p>What Year Is This?</p>
<p>What I wanted to title this is &#8220;Are You New Here&#8221;? and yet I changed my mind because I am starting to realize that yeah, some people are new to this whole &#8220;sexism&#8221; thing.  I had a weekend off, so I spent time catching up on some TV time, not the news channels, actually looking for shows.  That was interesting, nothing, and I mean nothing was on, until I hit the biography channel. Two shows caught my eye, &#8220;Hippies&#8221; and &#8220;Sex In 69&#8243;, now that might hold my attention, since I lived it.  Hippies is great and I recommend to anyone that has teenagers that think they are changing the world, to sit them down and watch this.  But the show that really caught me was &#8220;Sex In 69&#8243;, I had no idea just how much the year 1969 changed the world.  You see I graduated from high school in ’69, so I was busy living it, never thinking that history was in the making.  This show was a huge reminder of what our generation &#8220;the baby boomers&#8221; were doing back then.  All the major revolutions in culture were happening, and watching it, instead of living it was eye opening.  It was the beginning of the sexual revolution, gay liberation, the civil rights, music, art, everything changed in this country in that year.  We not only went to the moon, we changed this planet.</p>
<p>I’ve always known that I came from a very special time. Just our music alone tells me that.  I think anyone that is my age deep down inside realizes that.  Even though today most would think that we a very open minded people, it’s quite evident to some of us, that isn’t quite true.  In a lot of ways we have gone backward, especially when it comes to all the &#8220;isms&#8221;.  Sexism, racism, genderism, chauvinism, all those lovely &#8220;isms&#8221; are back stronger than ever.  And does it confuse the hell out of me.</p>
<p>All the talk about what happen on Letterman and the sexism, only proves it.  It proves that somewhere along the way from 1969 to 2009, the ball got dropped.  Women have regressed 40 years, from sisterhood to &#8220;hey, I got mine, you get yours&#8221;.   Especially in the comedy industry.  Watching all these shows for women from The View to Joy Behar’s new show and their shock about this is truly laughable.  Like I said earlier &#8220;Are you new here?&#8221;.  More men writing for Leno and Letterman than women, really?  Please whatever sisterhood we had has totally gone out and has been replaced by, well it hasn’t been replaced, it’s just plain gone.  It doesn’t exist anymore, especially in the world of comedy, and especially in stand-up.  Take some time and count the female headliners in clubs this week.  If you get five, you’ll be counting in &#8220;comedy math&#8221;.  You cannot and will not find five female headliners.  Now, count the male headliners.</p>
<p>To quote one club owner &#8220;I already have four women headliners, that’s enough&#8221;.  Are you serious?  Four women, four weeks out of the year, the other 48, men, normally, three men, talking about the same thing men talk about&#8212;-mostly us.</p>
<p>If men are uncomfortable with women, especially in comedy, it’s because we know your show and we know your mind, you are idiots, nasty, stinky, arrogant idiots.  And screw you, women are funny, and I have had enough of this bullshit.</p>
<p>And the fact that women that are in positions to help other women in comedy are sitting around in their happy hosting chairs even promoting this stupid line of questioning, makes them idiots too.  I’m sorry ladies, I know just how much &#8220;sisterhood&#8221; we have in this business, none, nada, neit, uhuh, there is none.  So stop, take a deep breathe and think about all this.  Start asking the questions that we care about.  Some of you were ready to hang Clarence Thomas, while some of us were saying &#8220;this woman is an idiot&#8221;, but then again I came from a different time period.  I was a secretary back then, yes we had these problems, but we also had the phone number of the wife and the mistress, game over. </p>
<p>So to answer the question &#8220;Why is this still happening?&#8221; Answer:  Because you let it, that’s why, and the ones of us that trying to stop it, well I think you know what we are called.  Sisterhood is a memory, a good memory, but a memory still.  It’s a shame that the young women of today never got to understand what that truly meant.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Caroline Picard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
